What are the synoptic Gospels? Why are they considered to be inaccurate?

The synoptic Gospels are the first three books of the New Testament of the Bible: Matthew, Mark, and Luke. They are known as the synoptic Gospels because they share a similar structure and content. However, despite their similarities, they are also considered to be inaccurate.

One of the main reasons why the synoptic Gospels are considered to be inaccurate is because of the differences between them. While they share many of the same stories and teachings, they also have significant variations in the details. For example, the Gospel of Matthew says that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, while the Gospel of Luke says that he was born in Nazareth.

Another reason why the synoptic Gospels are considered to be inaccurate is because they were not written by eyewitnesses. Instead, they were written by anonymous authors who compiled the stories and teachings of Jesus from various sources. This means that the authors did not witness the events themselves and may have relied on secondhand accounts, which could have been distorted over time.

Additionally, the synoptic Gospels were written several decades after the events they describe. This means that the authors were writing from memory and may have embellished or altered the stories to make them more compelling.

Despite these inaccuracies, the synoptic Gospels are still considered to be important sources of information about the life and teachings of Jesus. They provide us with a glimpse into the beliefs and practices of early Christianity and offer insight into the ways in which Jesus was perceived by his followers.

Subscribe to Bible Analysis

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe