Was the Pharaoh During the Exodus Amenhotep II, and Was He Like the Antichrist?

Some scholars have suggested that Amenhotep II was like the Antichrist, a figure described in the Bible as a powerful and evil ruler who will rise to power in the end times.

The story of the Exodus, in which the Israelites were led out of slavery in Egypt by Moses, is one of the most famous stories in the Bible. However, the identity of the Pharaoh who ruled Egypt at the time of the Exodus remains a matter of debate among scholars and historians. Some have suggested that the Pharaoh was Amenhotep II, and that he was like the Antichrist. Here are some key insights:

The reign of Amenhotep II.

Amenhotep II was a Pharaoh of the 18th dynasty of Egypt who ruled from 1427-1401 BC. He was the son of Thutmose III, who is regarded as one of the greatest Pharaohs of Egypt. Amenhotep II was a military leader who was known for his campaigns in Syria and Palestine.

The evidence for Amenhotep II as the Pharaoh of the Exodus.

There is no direct evidence in the archaeological record that Amenhotep II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. However, some scholars have suggested that he fits the profile of the Pharaoh described in the Bible. For example, the Bible describes the Pharaoh as a powerful ruler who refused to let the Israelites go, even after Moses had performed a series of miracles. Amenhotep II was a strong and stubborn ruler who was known for his military prowess, and he may have been the type of leader who would have resisted the demands of the Israelites.

The comparison to the Antichrist.

Some scholars have suggested that Amenhotep II was like the Antichrist, a figure described in the Bible as a powerful and evil ruler who will rise to power in the end times. This comparison is based on the idea that Amenhotep II was a ruthless and cruel leader who was willing to do whatever it took to maintain his power and control.

The limitations of historical evidence.

While the story of the Exodus is a well-known and beloved part of the Bible, the historical evidence for the events described in the story is limited. There is no direct evidence in the archaeological record that the Israelites were ever enslaved in Egypt, or that they ever wandered in the desert for 40 years. Similarly, there is no direct evidence that Amenhotep II was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. These limitations mean that much of what we know about the Exodus and the Pharaoh is based on interpretation and speculation.

Subscribe to Bible Analysis

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe